
Loading, please wait...

Loading, please wait...

The World Health Organization (WHO) faces a significant WHO withdrawal crisis ahead of its annual World Health Assembly (WHA) in May. The WHA, which acts as the WHO's decision-making body, must now address the announced departures of two major member states: the United States and Argentina. Washington's withdrawal became effective on January 22, 2026, one year after President Donald Trump handed the official notice. However, the exit remains contentious. This is because the US still has not fulfilled a critical condition of its 1948 accession agreement: settling all its financial obligations.
The United States, historically the WHO's largest financial donor, owes approximately $260 million in assessed dues for 2024 and 2025. Congress included a provision for withdrawal in 1948, allowing the US to leave only after one year's notice and paying all financial obligations. Therefore, US ally Israel, speaking at the WHO Executive Board meeting in Geneva, argued that member states should not compel countries against their national decisions. Israel’s representative stated there is "no valid reason to further discuss this matter in any WHO forum." Conversely, China voiced astonishment at the board's collective silence. Beijing's representative insisted that major countries must lead by example and cannot "treat the WHO as something to be used as it fits and abandoned when it doesn't." The WHO constitution does not feature a general withdrawal clause, which further complicates the legal interpretation of the US's current status.
Argentina followed the US, submitting its own notice to exit the organization in March. Subsequently, Argentina and Israel introduced a draft resolution to the Executive Board. This resolution explicitly recommended that the May WHA endorse Buenos Aires' withdrawal. Although the board adopted the draft without formal objection, some member states voiced regret over the decision. Argentina's ambassador, Carlos Mario Foradori, maintained that leaving the WHO does not mean "leaving the world." He stated that the country will continue to respect international rules, especially since "Pandemics do not recognise borders." The loss of two major member states has created significant financial pressure. Consequently, the WHO has had to plan staff cuts, impacting its ability to support programs like vaccination drives and outbreak responses. WHO Chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus warned that the decision is dangerous for both the US and the world, citing ongoing needs for global health security.
Q1: What financial obligation does the US still owe to the WHO?
The United States owes approximately $260 million in outstanding dues for the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. Fulfilling this financial obligation was a condition of its 1948 agreement with the WHO for withdrawal.
Q2: When will the final decision on the US and Argentina withdrawal be made?
The World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO's decision-making body, is expected to address and vote on the formal withdrawal status of both the US and Argentina during its annual meeting in May.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice or replace professional judgment. Refer to the latest local and national guidelines for clinical practice.
References

Read summarized clinical updates, watch expert medical content, and earn CME certifications right from your smartphone.


The WHO's decision-making body will vote in May on the US and Argentina's withdrawal. The US withdrawal is complicated by $260 million in unpaid financial d...
7 months ago

A new study reveals that lipid-related metabolic dysregulation, marked by elevated TG/HDL-C ratio and glymphatic changes, independently impacts survival in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.
Today

A premature neonate developed upper limb compartment syndrome after uterine rupture extruded the arm through a scar defect. Conservative management with continuous monitoring yielded complete functional recovery and normal limb growth at 10-year follow-up, highlighting non-operative safety in selected cases.
Today

A meta-analysis of 13 propensity score-matched studies shows ViV-TAVR delivers lower early mortality and reduced bleeding compared to redo-SAVR for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valves, though long-term hemodynamics warrant careful anatomical and patient-centered evaluation.
Today

Endoscopic posterior cervical fusion combines minimally invasive decompression, joint preparation, and rigid screw-rod fixation for atlantoaxial pathologies. Early clinical findings demonstrate solid bony union, excellent symptom relief, and minimal soft-tissue morbidity without significant vascular compromise.
Yesterday

The All-India Food Processors' Association has approached the Supreme Court to oppose FSSAI's proposed per-100g benchmark for front-of-pack warning labels, advocating instead for a per-serving threshold. We explore the regulatory showdown, nutritional evidence, and implications for clinical lifestyle counseling.
Today