.webp&w=384&q=75){kind=logo}
Loading, please wait...
Loading, please wait...
The AIIMS Delhi leadership transition began recently after the appointment of Dr. M Srinivas as a member of NITI Aayog. Consequently, the institute expects to name an interim director before the government appoints a full-time head. This move creates a temporary vacancy at the helm of India's premier medical institution. Currently, officials remain focused on ensuring administrative continuity during this period of change.
Selection of a permanent director typically takes several months. Therefore, the institute often relies on the senior-most faculty member to lead in the interim. This approach follows established conventions within the organization. While the government aims to move quickly, the rigorous selection process for a full-time leader requires significant time and deliberation. Furthermore, internal leadership remains a traditional preference for the institute.
Several names are currently circulating within the medical community. For instance, Dr. Nikhil Tandon, head of endocrinology, and Dr. Radhika Tandon, Professor of Ophthalmology, are prominent figures. Additionally, Prof. Sandeep Chauhan, head of cardiac anesthesia, is also mentioned as a potential candidate. However, sources caution that the government has not finalized any decision yet. The senior-most person usually holds the charge until a formal appointment occurs.
Dr. M Srinivas took charge in September 2022, succeeding Dr. Randeep Guleria. His tenure saw the institute navigate challenges such as a significant ransomware attack on its servers. Despite this, he maintained stability across departments. Historically, AIIMS Delhi favors leaders who have risen through its own ranks. Although Dr. Srinivas had prior links to the institute, his selection came from a wider panel considered by the Appointments Committee of Cabinet.
Q1: Why is AIIMS Delhi appointing an interim director?
AIIMS Delhi needs an interim head because the current director, Dr. M Srinivas, has been appointed as a member of NITI Aayog. A full-time appointment may take several months to finalize.
Q2: Who is typically chosen as the interim director at AIIMS?
According to established conventions, the senior-most faculty member is usually asked to hold the charge until a permanent director is selected.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice or replace professional judgment. Refer to the latest local and national guidelines for clinical practice.
References
Read summarized clinical updates, watch expert medical content, and earn CME certifications right from your smartphone.
Open your smartphone camera to scan and install.
AIIMS Delhi seeks an interim director following Dr M Srinivas’s move to NITI Aayog. Explore the transition process and the potential senior faculty candidat...
4 months ago
A large NHANES cohort study reveals that higher Healthy Eating Index scores significantly reduce all-cause mortality risk in CKD patients by 45%. This analysis highlights the importance of comprehensive diet quality and medical nutrition therapy in renal care to optimize long-term clinical survival.
Today
Explore real-world data showing how private oncogenetics and molecular tumor boards achieve 3-week consult turnaround, high ctDNA actionability, and vital germline variant detection, enhancing individualized cancer care and familial risk assessment.
Today
A meta-analysis of 13 propensity score-matched studies shows ViV-TAVR delivers lower early mortality and reduced bleeding compared to redo-SAVR for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valves, though long-term hemodynamics warrant careful anatomical and patient-centered evaluation.
Today
Endoscopic posterior cervical fusion combines minimally invasive decompression, joint preparation, and rigid screw-rod fixation for atlantoaxial pathologies. Early clinical findings demonstrate solid bony union, excellent symptom relief, and minimal soft-tissue morbidity without significant vascular compromise.
Today
The All-India Food Processors' Association has approached the Supreme Court to oppose FSSAI's proposed per-100g benchmark for front-of-pack warning labels, advocating instead for a per-serving threshold. We explore the regulatory showdown, nutritional evidence, and implications for clinical lifestyle counseling.
Today
