
Loading, please wait...

Loading, please wait...

This phase 3 noninferiority trial compared rituximab with ocrelizumab in adults with newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis and recent disease activity. Participants were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to receive rituximab or ocrelizumab every six months for 24 months. Of 218 randomized participants, 216 received treatment: 132 received rituximab and 84 received ocrelizumab. The primary outcome was the absence of new or enlarging T2-weighted MRI lesions between months 6 and 24. The estimated probability of remaining free of new or enlarging lesions was 92.2% with rituximab and 94.8% with ocrelizumab, a risk difference of −2.6 percentage points (95% CI, −9.4 to 4.3), meeting the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Relapse rates, disability outcomes, and cognitive performance appeared similar between groups. Infections were reported in 82% of participants receiving rituximab and 69% receiving ocrelizumab; serious adverse events occurred in 8% and 7%, respectively. Conclusion: Rituximab was noninferior to ocrelizumab for suppressing MRI-detected disease activity over the specified period, with broadly similar serious adverse-event rates. These findings may inform treatment selection, although infection risk, cost, local availability, and longer-term outcomes remain important considerations

Read summarized clinical updates, watch expert medical content, and earn CME certifications right from your smartphone.


This phase 3 noninferiority trial compared rituximab with ocrelizumab in adults with newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis and recent disease activity. Participants were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to receive rituximab or ocrelizumab every six months for 24 months. Of 218 randomized participants, 216 received treatment: 132 received rituximab and 84 received ocrelizumab. The primary outcome was the absence of new or enlarging T2-weighted MRI lesions between months 6 and 24. The estimated probability of remaining free of new or enlarging lesions was 92.2% with rituximab and 94.8% with ocrelizumab, a risk difference of −2.6 percentage points (95% CI, −9.4 to 4.3), meeting the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Relapse rates, disability outcomes, and cognitive performance appeared similar between groups. Infections were reported in 82% of participants receiving rituximab and 69% receiving ocrelizumab; serious adverse events occurred in 8% and 7%, respectively. Conclusion: Rituximab was noninferior to ocrelizumab for suppressing MRI-detected disease activity over the specified period, with broadly similar serious adverse-event rates. These findings may inform treatment selection, although infection risk, cost, local availability, and longer-term outcomes remain important considerations
Today

Kenya's confirmation of its eighth Ebola infection highlights the acute risk of secondary transmission in hospital environments. Clinicians must maintain high vigilance, enforce strict infection prevention protocols, and implement rapid triage mechanisms for viral hemorrhagic fevers across healthcare settings.
Last week

Maternal anaemia contributes to nearly half of pregnancy-related fatalities across India. To prevent complications, Uttar Pradesh has added single-dose parenteral iron to its essential medicines list. This clinical transition aims to restore haemoglobin rapidly and protect high-risk mothers across rural facilities.
2 weeks back

India's food safety authority FSSAI has issued show-cause notices to Gemini Edibles, BigBasket, and Flipkart for unpermitted cardiovascular claims regarding Freedom Rice Bran Oil. This regulatory move highlights the strict enforcement of advertising standards and the clinical necessity of evidence-based lipid care.
Last week

The state government is deploying helicopter emergency medical services across the Mumbai-Pune Expressway, Samruddhi Mahamarg, and Mumbai-Goa Highway. This initiative establishes unified standard operating procedures to enable rapid triage, advanced prehospital resuscitation, and seamless trauma care transfers.
Last week

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease guidelines often rely on European-derived lipoprotein(a) cutoffs. However, baseline Lp(a) levels vary widely across ancestries, including South Asians and Africans. Clinicians must interpret Lp(a) values within overall absolute cardiovascular risk.
2 weeks back