
Loading, please wait...

Loading, please wait...

Sigmoidoscopy remains a vital tool for colorectal cancer screening. However, the endoscopist impact on pain often dictates the success of these unsedated procedures. A recent cross-sectional study analyzed over 23,000 sigmoidoscopies to determine why patient-reported pain varies so widely. Researchers found that while patient characteristics matter, the specific clinician performing the procedure is a dominant factor. Consequently, clinicians with more years of experience significantly reduced the odds of moderate to severe discomfort for their patients. Specifically, each additional year of experience decreased the pain rate by nearly 18%.
Pain during a procedure is more than an unpleasant experience for the patient. Furthermore, high pain scores directly impacted the clinical efficacy of the examination. When patients experienced severe pain, completion rates dropped by nearly 67%. There was also a concerning trend toward a lower adenoma detection rate (ADR) in painful procedures. Therefore, minimizing pain is not just a matter of patient satisfaction but a critical quality indicator. Targeted training and consistent monitoring can help standardize performance across all endoscopists. This study underscores the need for ongoing quality assessment in screening programs.
Yes, research shows that high levels of pain are strongly associated with lower examination completion rates. Specifically, patients reporting moderate or severe pain were significantly less likely to have a successful, complete procedure compared to those with minimal discomfort.
Independent predictors of pain include the specific endoscopist's level of experience, female sex, and younger patient age. Clinical conditions such as the presence of diverticula or inflammatory bowel disease also significantly increase the likelihood of procedural pain.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice or establish a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the advice of a qualified healthcare provider regarding a medical condition. Refer to the latest local and national guidelines for clinical practice.
References
Schult AL et al. Endoscopist as a key determinant of patient pain: a sigmoidoscopy screening model for unbiased assessment. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2026 Apr 14. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2026.2646941. PMID: 41981718.
Bugajski M, Wieszczy P, Hoff G, et al. Modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after screening colonoscopy. Gut 2018; 67(11): 1958–1964.
Ramakrishnan K, et al. Selecting patients for flexible sigmoidoscopy: Determinants of incomplete depth of insertion. Cancer 2005; 104(6): 1256-1262.

Read summarized clinical updates, watch expert medical content, and earn CME certifications right from your smartphone.


Research highlights that endoscopist performance and experience are major determinants of patient pain during unsedated sigmoidoscopy....
4 months ago

A new study reveals that lipid-related metabolic dysregulation, marked by elevated TG/HDL-C ratio and glymphatic changes, independently impacts survival in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.
Today

A premature neonate developed upper limb compartment syndrome after uterine rupture extruded the arm through a scar defect. Conservative management with continuous monitoring yielded complete functional recovery and normal limb growth at 10-year follow-up, highlighting non-operative safety in selected cases.
Today

A meta-analysis of 13 propensity score-matched studies shows ViV-TAVR delivers lower early mortality and reduced bleeding compared to redo-SAVR for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valves, though long-term hemodynamics warrant careful anatomical and patient-centered evaluation.
Today

Endoscopic posterior cervical fusion combines minimally invasive decompression, joint preparation, and rigid screw-rod fixation for atlantoaxial pathologies. Early clinical findings demonstrate solid bony union, excellent symptom relief, and minimal soft-tissue morbidity without significant vascular compromise.
Yesterday

The All-India Food Processors' Association has approached the Supreme Court to oppose FSSAI's proposed per-100g benchmark for front-of-pack warning labels, advocating instead for a per-serving threshold. We explore the regulatory showdown, nutritional evidence, and implications for clinical lifestyle counseling.
Today