
Loading, please wait...

Loading, please wait...

The Delhi High Court recently clarified SPMD counselling eligibility for NEET-PG 2025 candidates in a significant legal development. Specifically, Justice Jasmeet Singh ruled that candidates who did not join a stray vacancy seat remain eligible. This ruling overturned earlier directives from the National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences (NBEMS). Consequently, doctors who were previously barred can now participate in the Sponsored Post MBBS DNB process. However, they must still forfeit their security deposits for the non-joining of their original seats.
The court emphasized a clear distinction between the allotment of a seat and the actual joining of a course. Furthermore, the bench noted that pursuing a postgraduate degree requires a binding admission through physical joining. Therefore, the mere act of being allotted a seat in the Stray Vacancy Round does not constitute pursuing a course. NBEMS had argued that such candidates should be disqualified to prevent the harmful practice of seat blocking. Nevertheless, the court rejected this administrative interpretation as it effectively rewrote existing regulatory rules. Administrative bodies cannot impose penalties that the official guidelines do not explicitly provide.
This ruling relies heavily on the Supreme Court's earlier judgment in the case of State of U.P. v. Bhavna Tiwari. In that instance, the apex court limited the consequences of non-joining to the forfeiture of security fees. Additionally, further penalties like debarment currently depend on the implementation of the National Exit Test (NExT). Since the government has not yet enforced NExT, additional disqualifications remain legally unsustainable. While seat blocking remains a valid concern, regulators must address it through clear and formal provisions. For now, the High Court allows petitioners to proceed with their SPMD applications for the 2025 session. Candidates should stay updated on any further notifications from the NBEMS regarding these revised eligibility standards.
Q1: Does skipping a NEET-PG Stray Vacancy seat disqualify me from SPMD counselling?
A1: According to the Delhi High Court, you remain eligible, though you will forfeit your security deposit.
Q2: What is the court's definition of "pursuing" a PG course?
A2: The court defines pursuing a course as actually joining it, not just receiving a seat allotment.
Q3: How does the Bhavna Tiwari case affect this ruling?
A3: The court used this precedent to show that penalties for non-joining are limited to fee forfeiture until NExT starts.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice or replace professional judgment. Refer to the latest local and national guidelines for clinical practice.
References

Read summarized clinical updates, watch expert medical content, and earn CME certifications right from your smartphone.


The Delhi High Court ruled that NEET-PG candidates who did not join a stray vacancy seat remain eligible for SPMD counselling after forfeiting security depo...
5 months ago

Dendritic cells bridge innate and adaptive immunity in myocardial infarction. This review explores their pathological roles, circulating dynamics, novel tolerogenic interventions, and how standard cardiovascular medications modulate dendritic cells to improve post-infarction myocardial repair and patient outcomes.
Today

A premature neonate developed upper limb compartment syndrome after uterine rupture extruded the arm through a scar defect. Conservative management with continuous monitoring yielded complete functional recovery and normal limb growth at 10-year follow-up, highlighting non-operative safety in selected cases.
Today

Atherosclerosis involves extensive glycometabolic reprogramming across immune and vascular cells. This review examines how glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway, and lactate-driven epigenetic shifts fuel plaque vulnerability, while highlighting novel therapeutic targets like PFKFB3 and LDHA.
Today

Endoscopic posterior cervical fusion combines minimally invasive decompression, joint preparation, and rigid screw-rod fixation for atlantoaxial pathologies. Early clinical findings demonstrate solid bony union, excellent symptom relief, and minimal soft-tissue morbidity without significant vascular compromise.
Yesterday

The All-India Food Processors' Association has approached the Supreme Court to oppose FSSAI's proposed per-100g benchmark for front-of-pack warning labels, advocating instead for a per-serving threshold. We explore the regulatory showdown, nutritional evidence, and implications for clinical lifestyle counseling.
Today